Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

View Poll Results: What do you think about ArenaNet charging us $10 for extra storage panes?
I am definitely not going buy this because they are charging us. 291 21.57%
I think $10 is too much. They should lower the price. 353 26.17%
10$ is a fair price to me. I will buy them if I need them. 275 20.39%
I'll pay $5 or $10, don't care which. 77 5.71%
I could care less. I am not buying it. 353 26.17%
Voters: 1349. This poll is closed

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 24, 2009, 08:22 AM // 08:22   #921
Grotto Attendant
 
upier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Done.
Guild: [JUNK]
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamWind View Post
Now getting back to the point, you guys are using the argument that storage isn't part of the gameplay. Whos gameplay? Maybe not yours? Try taking away the storage from everybody and get back to me on how many people enjoy the gameplay. You guys are fooling yourselves if you don't think storage is a part of the gameplay.

And if you still don't believe that, then you have to convince me that storage is somehow part of the vanity category, which in the context of this thread is referring to how your characters look. Good luck convincing anybody storage fits into that.


Pure vanity.
upier is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2009, 08:31 AM // 08:31   #922
Krytan Explorer
 
immortius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Black Cats
Profession: E/Mo
Default

Gameplay and vanity is a false dichotomy. Storage can be something else entirely.
immortius is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 10:11 PM // 22:11   #923
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kamadan AD1
Guild: Zealots Of Shiverpeak [ZoS]
Profession: D/A
Default

They recently lowered the price....i still feel that it is too expensive.
king swift is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 10:34 PM // 22:34   #924
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Louisiana
Profession: E/Me
Default

Sweet necro.

I bought as many panes as I could as soon as I could--at full price. I have no regrets.
Martin Firestorm is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 10:49 PM // 22:49   #925
Krytan Explorer
 
Hyperventilate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere in California
Guild: I Gots A Crayon [Blue]
Profession: Me/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Firestorm View Post
Sweet necro.

I bought as many panes as I could as soon as I could--at full price. I have no regrets.
Necromancy thread: Go!


I happened to be refreshing the website as soon as they announced the panes. I bought that them instant.


No regrets at all. Not even with the price reduction... no regrets. Tis nice.
Hyperventilate is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2009, 01:26 AM // 01:26   #926
Alcoholic
 
Aussie Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Profession: W/
Default

O.o oh well i still relevant today I guess
but I still ain't buying any with international exchange rates from AU to UK
I know they need money coming in and paying employees but hope they have
it later on at %50 off not %25 or some other deal like buy one get one free.
PS don't want to start panes v buying Accounts but it's cheaper for me to buy
Profs here for $9.95AU if i wanted storage.
Aussie Boy is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2009, 01:35 AM // 01:35   #927
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Highlander Of Alba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Guild: Real Rogue Clan
Profession: Rt/Mo
Default

Well i have some panes ..does not bother me in the slightest that i had to pay for them. Yes nobody forces you to buy...so its buyers choice

For a game that has no monthly fees and what I hve spent over 4 years I consider it minimal. Mabe new guys may feel like its expensive but I think
its an option Sure buy a slot and a have the best of both worlds.

So if you can manage to have your chest full with things you need
not hoarding then you have enough storage as it is
Highlander Of Alba is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2009, 07:19 AM // 07:19   #928
Academy Page
 
Aldo wants more's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, UK
Default

If I knew that the money from buying storage tabs was being directly re invested into more content for GW1 then I may be tempted.

Overall, $10 is still too much for a storage tab when the same amount of money can buy a standalone campaign.

/undecided

Last edited by Aldo wants more; Oct 13, 2009 at 07:23 AM // 07:23..
Aldo wants more is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2009, 07:53 AM // 07:53   #929
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default

I can't see investing anymore into a game that will be dead space not too long in the distant future. Everyone who is anyone is going to GW2 and to put more money into this game "especially $40" for some silly storage containers is just being a fool. Ok so they are $7.50 now big deal still way too much. Buying another mule would get you more slots than the four extra slots combined would give you. If you're too lazy to log out and log in to get what you want then I guess you deserve to pay the extra waste of money. Having another account will also save you time and money vs this ripoff.
QueenofDeath is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 04:53 PM // 16:53   #930
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldo wants more View Post
If I knew that the money from buying storage tabs was being directly re invested into more content for GW1 then I may be tempted.

Overall, $10 is still too much for a storage tab when the same amount of money can buy a standalone campaign.

/undecided
Amen Brah. and the way things are looking as of late, I'm not so sure I want to invest monies into GW2..at least not just yet.

EMBARGO ON!

Who.Run.Bartertown?
gone is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 05:11 PM // 17:11   #931
Forge Runner
 
Karate Jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Guild: Reign of Judgment [RoJ]
Profession: Me/
Default

Meh, I'm still "boycotting".

Really, I'd rather just buy another account (EDIT:actually, at the current price of my closest PC game store, I could buy 2 accounts for almost the same price of 1 storage pane :/) if I need more storage. It's really not that inconvenient to move stuff around and I always end up using those accounts for something.

Last edited by Karate Jesus; Oct 14, 2009 at 05:13 PM // 17:13..
Karate Jesus is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 06:55 PM // 18:55   #932
Hell's Protector
 
Quaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Guild: Brothers Disgruntled
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by king swift View Post
They are selling virtual space, so Ill pay with my virtual gold. If you would like to reimburse my gold for real money, then Ill be happy to pay with real money. Bottom line is Anet is selling AIR. Its free to breathe it, so whats the pricetag for?
This whole thread becomes a joke just by this statement alone. The whole f'n game is virtual space ffs!

I'm not even going to read any more of this, if this is indicative of the idiocy involved.
Quaker is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 08:41 PM // 20:41   #933
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default

The thing is not that they are selling virtual space, it is that they are selling it at a premium price while the cheaper mule account alternative has existed since the very start.

If the price was at least close to what we get from buying a mule account I'd buy it.
I think after all the OCD users got their panes sales stopped so now they're seeing how much more can they milk this cow by lowering the price incrementally. Of course, we already had mule accounts for storage and we got those cheaper than the stupid panes so I'm not surprised they are desperately trying to push more sales.
I'm pretty sure if they made them 1 or 2 bucks a pop they will earn much more than keeping them at this ridiculous price.
Chico is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 08:54 PM // 20:54   #934
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default

I'd pay $10 for all 4 but that's it. Ain't worth more than that.
QueenofDeath is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 10:01 PM // 22:01   #935
Krytan Explorer
 
rohara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: Rt/
Default

i begrudgingly bought all 4 panes when they went on sale. i still think the price is ridiculous, but i don't think anet will make them any cheaper anytime soon. i don't have time to grind for large equip packs for 13 characters and i'm tired of swapping stuff around my mules. i bet they made the large equip packs so hard to get just to make people buy more storage. /tinfoilhat
rohara is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2009, 10:51 PM // 22:51   #936
Jungle Guide
 
Shadowspawn X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: Fellowship of Champions
Profession: R/E
Default

The reason the panes don't sell is that the need for storage is not there and has always been exaggerated since we went from 1 pane to 4 panes. Offering storage in a stagnant game after everyone has finished the available content is why sales are down not the price of the pane. If Anet released a new chapter the panes would sell like hotcakes at 15 bucks a whoop.
Shadowspawn X is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2009, 01:08 AM // 01:08   #937
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Default

$9.99 = pack mule (25 slots +equipment) and extra game.

nuff said.
headlesshobbs is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2009, 02:09 AM // 02:09   #938
Furnace Stoker
 
Yawgmoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowspawn X
The reason the panes don't sell is that the need for storage is not there and has always been exaggerated since we went from 1 pane to 4 panes. Offering storage in a stagnant game after everyone has finished the available content is why sales are down not the price of the pane. If Anet released a new chapter the panes would sell like hotcakes at 15 bucks a whoop.
Disagree. The need for storage increases with time even with a stagnant game, as players get more and more various stuff when playing. Since in GW everything is equal, you don't get better armors or weapons, you keep getting more of the same instead of replacing worse with better. Also many players like to collect things and collections grow over time. And don't forget that Anet actually keeps adding _entirely new items_ to the game even when they don't release much new content.
And most imporant thing not to be forgotten - GW still doesn't have ANY automated trading system at all, so selling is a big pain and items for sale take hundreds of slots.

Still the panes are vastly overpriced, I didn't buy any despite I would make good use of all 4. That's a boycott.

I hope Anet didn't sell as much of those as they expected.
Because if it exceeded their expectations, they will only abuse the fact even more. They'll make even more even smaller addons for even more absurd prices and find ways to have them give advantages over players who don't buy them. Then there's GW2 coming, and it's business model and addon pricing is likely to be based upon the results of this grand test - a test of how much can they rip off the players.
Just imagine the hell of having to buy more and more $10 tiny storage panes in GW2 because the initial storage amount is only enough for a couple weeks of play. And it can get worse than that.
Boycott of a blatant rip is wise.
Yawgmoth is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2009, 02:20 AM // 02:20   #939
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Shy Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Guild: ...
Profession: W/
Default

There really is nothing to boycott. Areanet offered extra storage, except it costs money. You dont have to buy it. They're not forcing you. Yes, I think $10 is way too much, but again, optional is the key word. So what are we boycotting again? Areanet will do nothing.
Shy Guy is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2009, 02:46 AM // 02:46   #940
Jungle Guide
 
Kumu Honua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Default

Boycott? I don't think my not purchasing the upgrades is a boycott per se. It's just that I do not think the panes hold enough value to justify the price.

As someone else said recently in this necro thread, $10 for all 4? I'd pay that. If not, I can just pay the same price to get an additional character slot.

$10 - Additional character slot to play on, +100 plat available storage, +50 item slots in regular bags/pouch, +20 weapon/armor storage if I get a heavy pack, +1 weapon slot, +1 shield/focus slot, +5 armor slots for runes.

or...

$10 - +20 slots.

The math doesn't favor the storage panes at all.
Kumu Honua is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
furikuriallday The Riverside Inn 37 Jul 30, 2006 10:20 AM // 10:20
DragonEye The Riverside Inn 14 Feb 27, 2006 01:23 PM // 13:23
Boycott XBox360 Sir Skullcrasher Off-Topic & the Absurd 487 Jan 12, 2006 05:48 AM // 05:48
Yellow_lid The Riverside Inn 14 Aug 11, 2005 09:36 PM // 21:36


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:14 PM // 13:14.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("